Does clair knowing come from the heart?

I aim for the most natural communications from Spirit to my recipient, so that each communication is as direct as possible. 

The theory behind natural mediumship is simple: allow Spirit to speak in their own voice whilst you bring through their emotions so every communication is unique.

When we bring in our own minds to interpret images, things usually go wrong. 


For instance, a medium may say about a link: “This gentleman is showing a horse, so I know he rode horses.” If no one in the recipient’s family rode horses, the recipient will not accept that information.

If the medium said instead, “This gentleman shows a horse, let me describe it to you: it’s brown, and standing in a field. Its head is stretched down, eating grass .…” Because the medium gave this information without interpretation, the recipient could recall that a maternal grandfather once painted a landscape with a horse eating grass in a field that fits the description.

Of course, the medium may also ask the spirit communicator, “Why are you showing me this horse?” and will trust the answer will rise up, and be known immediately.

When we trust our clair knowing, which feels closer to our hearts, to our core, and not our minds, we succeed because the information is felt more thoroughly. The information we must impart to a recipient is laden with emotional memory known to their departed loved one; maybe it’s not immediately understood by the recipient, but it is info that can be verified by someone.

I believe that consciousness is not rooted in the body, but as human mediums, sensations arise within our bodies that have a correlation to our emotional center, our hearts.

If you are a medium who likes to interpret images given to you by Spirit, try something new. Hold an image not in your mind (whilst racing through your symbolism database) but feel the depths of it within your core being.

Feel within you that the image is significant. Describe it as truly as possible, and let the recipient herself place the image in the context of the communicator’s life, thus establishing evidence.